GOP leader Nikki Haley who was not seen in Donald Trump’s campaigning said the choice for her between Trump and vice president Kamala Harris is very easy. In an op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal, Nikki Halet wrote, “I don’t agree with Mr Trump 100% of the time. But I do agree with him most of the time and I disagree with Ms Harris nearly all the time. That makes this an easy call.”
Shark Tank businessman, billionaire Mark Cuban recently attacked Donald Trump over the absence of Haley in his campaign and said the former president does not like strong and intelligent women. While his comment rattled GOP women and several of them, including Tulsi Gabbard and Elon Musk’s mother Maye Musk, condemned Mark Cuban for the comment, Cuban apologized and said his comment was only in the context of Nikki Haley.
The Trump campaign was supposed to rope in Nikki Haley in the last stage of the campaigning but she was not seen in the campaigning. But in the op-ed, she said it’s an easy choice, “Our southern border is our most pressing security threat; Mr. Biden and Ms. Harris have made it dramatically worse,” the Republican wrote. “Their debacle in Afghanistan not only created a new terrorist state; it also signaled weakness that sparked Russia’s war against Ukraine.”
“Their appeasement of Iran has enriched that despotic regime and emboldened it to pursue war with Israel through its terrorist proxies,” Haley added.
A second Trump administration would not be perfect but that would include tax cuts, increased support for American energy and better standing on the world stage, Haley wrote. “These are enormous policy differences that will affect the lives of every American and much of the world,” Haley wrote. “Will Mr. Trump do some things I don’t like in a second term? I’m sure he will. If that was the question before voters, then I imagine Mr. Trump would lose.”
“But that isn’t the question in any election,” she added. “No politician gets everything right. For those of us clear-eyed enough to see Mr Trump’s flaws and honest enough to acknowledge them, the question is whether we’re better off with his policies or his opponent’s.”